![]() ![]() Some clung to tradition, and none could agree on a unifying symbol. It was dropped both times due to a lack of consent. The issue of a new flag was raised in Parliament in 1925 and again inġ945. But neither was distinctly Canadian, nor permanent. There were instead the Union Jack and the Canadian Red Ensign. For almost aĬentury, Canada did not fly a flag of its own. But it should also be singular, offering a picture of unity. Its symbolism should be expansive, representing perspectives from across the country. The designs express a vision forĬanada, still young and still finding its mode of self-expression.Ī national flag is a simple, effective way of identifying a country and expressing its collective will and sovereignty. It includes explanations for the symbols found in each. This article looks at 12 of those designs. The design process was open to the public. After months of vigorous debate, the final design was unfurled at The debate in 1964, he offered Canadians the chance to “say proudly to the world and to the future: ‘I stand for Canada.’” A joint committee of the Senate and House of Commons wasĪssembled to decide on a suitable design. There were instead the Union Jack and the Canadian Red Ensign. Its symbolism should be expansive, representing perspectives from across the country. Editorials are not usually updated.Ī national flag is a simple, effective way of identifying a country and expressing its collective will and sovereignty. The following article is an editorial written by The Canadian Encyclopedia staff. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |